Table 1. The comparisons between the predictions with and without docking on
50 targets selected from the CAMEO-LB dataset between 20160326 and 20160416.
a results without docking. b results after docking, where the ligand-binding pose was the one that matches the best with the consensus binding site prediciton.
c results after docking, where the ligand-binding pose was the one with lowest docking energy.
No. |
PDB ID |
Ligand ID |
MCCa |
MCCb |
MCCc |
Clasha |
Clashb |
Clashc |
1 | 4za0B | PAH | 0.67 | 0.41 | 0.23 | 3 | 1 | 2 |
2 | 5fsgA | MTT | 0.92 | 0.92 | 0.92 | 1 | 0 | 0 |
3 | 5ed1D | IHP | 0.97 | 0.8 | 0.8 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
4 | 4yuqB | KS1 | 0.77 | 0.77 | 0.77 | 2 | 0 | 0 |
5 | 4z6cA | 0KX | 0.14 | 0.14 | 0.14 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
6 | 5iqxA | HEM | 0.97 | 0.85 | 0.85 | 2 | 2 | 2 |
7 | 4uhmA | PLP | 1 | 0.9 | 0.61 | 1 | 0 | 0 |
8 | 5d3xB | 4IP | 1 | 0.92 | 0.76 | 1 | 0 | 0 |
9 | 4rfrB | RHN | 1 | 0.9 | 0.86 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
10 | 5j94A | 1XF | -0.04 | -0.05 | -0.04 | 1 | 0 | 0 |
11 | 5cfyE | ASP | 0.81 | 0.79 | 0.79 | 1 | 0 | 0 |
12 | 4xf1A | CYS | 0.95 | 0.91 | 0.79 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
13 | 5f8yB | X6X | 0.81 | 0.83 | 0.83 | 3 | 0 | 0 |
14 | 5hv3A | ANP | 1 | 0.89 | 0.73 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
15 | 5hi2A | BAX | 0.54 | 0.62 | 0.62 | 2 | 0 | 0 |
16 | 5esxB | 5GP | 0.71 | 0.75 | 0.69 | 2 | 0 | 0 |
17 | 5d75A | FK5 | 0.78 | 0.83 | 0.91 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
18 | 5frzB | 2MP | 0.85 | 0.86 | 0.79 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
19 | 5et6D | AMP | 0.88 | 0.85 | 0.78 | 1 | 0 | 0 |
20 | 4z7jA | RP5 | 0.69 | 0.57 | 0.57 | 1 | 0 | 0 |
21 | 5hidA | B1E | 0.56 | 0.64 | 0.64 | 1 | 0 | 0 |
22 | 5fwjB | MMK | 0.75 | 0.75 | 0.69 | 1 | 0 | 0 |
23 | 5d1nA | SAH | 0.89 | 0.82 | 0.82 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
24 | 5ep4A | ATP | 0.62 | 0.77 | 0.81 | 3 | 0 | 0 |
25 | 5anlA | RBQ | 0.74 | 0.78 | 0.83 | 1 | 0 | 0 |
26 | 4uj1A | NVX | 0.78 | 0.89 | 0.89 | 3 | 3 | 3 |
27 | 5hw0A | GLU | 0.94 | 0.89 | 0.89 | 1 | 0 | 0 |
28 | 5ensC | RHQ | -0.02 | -0.02 | -0.02 | 6 | 1 | 1 |
29 | 5fsyA | AR6 | 0.82 | 0.87 | 0.81 | 2 | 0 | 0 |
30 | 5hr6A | SF4 | 0.18 | 0.34 | 0.5 | 1 | 0 | 0 |
31 | 5dlpA | MBT | 0.2 | 0.56 | 0.56 | 1 | 0 | 0 |
32 | 4z51A | GNP | 0.71 | 0.79 | 0.79 | 7 | 0 | 0 |
33 | 4y22B | SGA | 0.66 | 0.63 | 0.63 | 3 | 0 | 0 |
34 | 5d0yB | FOL | 0.94 | 0.69 | 0.69 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
35 | 4z6dA | 1FZ | -0.04 | -0.04 | -0.04 | 1 | 1 | 1 |
36 | 4z07C | PCG | -0.05 | -0.05 | -0.05 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
37 | 5f8bA | GSH | 0.69 | 0.72 | 0.65 | 6 | 0 | 0 |
38 | 5h8yF | FES | 1 | 0.9 | 0.34 | 4 | 1 | 1 |
39 | 4yvnA | EBS | -0.02 | -0.01 | -0.01 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
40 | 5aniA | ES4 | 0.62 | 0.71 | 0.57 | 6 | 0 | 0 |
41 | 4ujaA | 4L7 | 0.84 | 0.87 | 0.87 | 3 | 3 | 3 |
42 | 5hesB | 032 | 0.65 | 0.73 | 0.75 | 1 | 0 | 0 |
43 | 5j3uA | CMP | -0.04 | -0.05 | -0.05 | 3 | 0 | 0 |
44 | 5eb4B | FAD | 0.91 | 0.69 | 0.69 | 4 | 1 | 1 |
45 | 5j23B | A2R | 0.65 | 0.64 | 0.65 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
46 | 5hraB | DAS | 0.85 | 0.78 | 0.78 | 2 | 0 | 0 |
47 | 5bw4A | SAM | 0.85 | 0.79 | 0.72 | 2 | 0 | 0 |
48 | 4yx6B | FMN | 0.91 | 0.8 | 0.8 | 1 | 0 | 0 |
49 | 5ihxA | TYR | 0.9 | 1 | 0.66 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
50 | 5fsxA | ADP | 0.67 | 0.74 | 0.72 | 2 | 0 | 0 |
51 | Average | -- | 0.67 | 0.66 | 0.62 | 1.72 | 0.26 | 0.28 |
P.S. The Clash column measures the total number of unique residues having steric clash with the ligand.
One residue is defined to have steric clash with the ligand when their closest atomic distance is less than three quarters of the sum of their Van der Waals radii.